I recently had my 20th birthday. I am no longer a teen, and it feels very strange. I've been considered a teen for seven years; now for the next 10 years I will be considered a young adult.
I am growing, changing, and developing. I have the body of a woman, but science has proven that I still have the mind of a child until my frontal cortex fully develops at age 25. CRAZY! I'm expected to decide my future in college before my brain has even finished developing, and the part of my brain that makes that decision is still developing! I think some people's frontal cortex develops faster than others, and at less than 25 they can make decisions. But for some people, that frontal cortex never gets put to use. That's why, even though young people often are the ones who change history and start revolutions, they are usually the soldiers of an older young person. Usually that person is over 25 - because their frontal cortex has developed by then and they can understand decision-making and the long-term effects of their decision.
Typically, 18 is seen as the first AGE TO BE. At 18, princes and princesses can inherit their thrones with complete power. At 18, children are no longer required to live with their parents, although most do. At 18, people can buy cigarettes and sell alcohol, although consuming alcohol is left for the 21-year-olds. They can be put away for life in prison, although that age requirement is dropping down lower and lower and is at 12, I think, which is completely and 100 percent WRONG. Children are not responsible for their decisions until they are 25 - but then again, who is, if they aren't? Should they be allowed to murder people, steal things, and do other violent crimes? If they can do the crime, they can do the time.
That's why our jail cells are full. Abandon children to a violent visual on-screen society and don't offset it except with 'be nice, don't hit' weak moral lessons at school, and then punish them when they commit the same crimes they see glamorized on television? Young children enamored and enveloped by society, ads, and shows. They're going to be evil! Change society and then the children will change. Children reflect their parents and society's influences.
So being 20 is a lot of pressure - but then again, it isn't ANY pressure. Go figure.
Lots of Love,Rachel
I am a laid-back person, but I am strong in my beliefs. I do not enjoy other people telling me how to believe or implying that everyone should be the exact same in their thinking. Christ died and rose again to take away away our sins and iniquities, not our minds, and he knitted us together in our mother's womb to make a difference in our world. I love people and God, and I can't wait to reach Heaven!
Thousand Foot Krutch
I love this band. I listen to them daily. Even though we are looking at another camera, we all look like we're alert for it being a fan signing and it's 11:30 p.m. on a Friday.
26 August 2010
25 August 2010
Ramble
Updated my blog all! Reviewed a TV show, mostly it's just my opinion. Feel free to comment on it! I hope people who like the show will present some reasons. I hope it isn't hurtful - that isn't the writer I'm trying to be, a cruel writer and really a shallow, inferior type of person who must diss others to feel better. Ooooo. Something's going on there. No, that is one character trait I will never be, even if I have to be nice to people like that.
Lots of Love,Rachel
Lots of Love,Rachel
Labels:
blog,
opinion,
show,
television
Posting Committment
Okay, so it's been a REALLY long time since I've posted. I've been busy this summer and stuff, working. Twenty-forty hours is a lot five days a week driving two hours round-trip to get there. Sorry guys I want to expose as much of my rambling as possible. I don't know that ANYONE other than myself reads this, but if someone does, I don't want to deprive them of my writing and rambling. Sometimes in the midst of it some good points are made. I hope my readers are pacified, and I just want to apologize and PROMISE to post by Saturday night for the next week. Maybe someday I will get to where I post two or three times a week. I want to be a writer, I should write more online, where our world is going, supposedly. Whatever.
Lots of Love,Rachel
Lots of Love,Rachel
28 May 2010
'Avatar' Need I Say More?
I just saw "Avatar" at the dollar theater. Even though most of the ideas from the movie clearly originated from the Native Americans and their struggle, it was still well-crafted and beautiful. I like how the Na'vi won and kicked the humans out of Pandora, except for a few who supported the Na'vi. The director thus said Europeans shouldn't have won in the battle against the Native Americans. The movie managed to succeed in being a social commentary; as 'civilized' people, we shouldn't brutally wipe out a people to get rich quick nor cruelly uproot them for our own gain. Selfishness hurts someone. Even though we can do it, we shouldn't.
It looked like James Cameron spent years creating the movie. I didn't see it in 3D, but if I had, I'm sure it would have been amazing. It won 6 awards and I'm not surprised. The effects were the best. They were absolutely beautiful.
Lots of Love,
Rachel
It looked like James Cameron spent years creating the movie. I didn't see it in 3D, but if I had, I'm sure it would have been amazing. It won 6 awards and I'm not surprised. The effects were the best. They were absolutely beautiful.
Lots of Love,
Rachel
Labels:
avatar review pretty
'Percy Jackson and the Olympians: The Lightning Thief' introduces the greek gods back into society
Strange but decent movie, not sure if I wholly recommend it or not, but great action, decent plot, decent acting.
Lots of Love,Rachel
Lots of Love,Rachel
Labels:
gods,
greek,
myths,
percy jackson
"Island Trilogy" Might be a Few Years Old, But It's Still Worth the Time
Never wrote a book review, but this is worth the read. I've read it three times self, the complete series is about 300 pages, but if you break it up it's great!
Lots of Love,Rachel
Lots of Love,Rachel
Another of My Favorite Movies: Gerard Butler in 'How to Train Your Dragon'
AWESOME, CUTE MOVIE. Definitely bring your kids to this one.
Lots of Love,Rachel
Lots of Love,Rachel
Labels:
cute,
gerard butler,
how to train your dragon,
kids
A New Kind of 'Robin Hood'
"Robin Hood" was unique and different and definitely good. People should see it in theaters! Definitely worth the money to see it.
Lots of Love,
Rachel
Lots of Love,
Rachel
'Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time' Dusts over the Competition
Even though "Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time" was based on a video game, I had never played the series, not being one much for video games. However, when I saw who that Jake Gyllenhaal was playing Dastan (pronounced Destin) I figured it would be interesting to see him in a movie (let's admit, he didn't look half-bad in the movie, either. Very sexy and heroic).
That's what happens a lot. People go to see a movie based on who's in it. Sometimes it turns out to be terrible, and sometimes, it turns out great.
"Prince of Persia" is one such movie that could have been awful but turned out quite well.
The king of Persia has two sons and one brother. However, it seems that his family is not yet complete, and when he is in the marketplace in one of his cities, he witnesses a courageous fatherless young boy, Dastan, a street rat who takes the punishment for one of his friends. Right before the soldiers chop off his hand, the king breaks in and declares that he is adopting the boy as his son. Why? Because the boy is extremely courageous...and because he would be a prince who did not have his eye on the Persian throne. And in that way a boy from the streets became a prince of Persia.
Fast forward fifteen years. Dastan is now preparing for battle and decides to stop a massacre. He gets in and the Persian people declare him the lion of Persia. He and his brothers take over the Holy City. Along the way he finds a dagger and a princess who is the guardian of the dagger- and the dagger happens to be the Dagger of Time, which can control time and take the person holding it back in time.
Dastan learns about the power only after his father is murdered. Dastan is framed for the murder and forced to flee with the princess (to whom his father has betrothed him) who wants nothing more than to slit his throat and steal the dagger back for its own protection. Dastan does not try to change the past and save his father with the dagger, for people can only go back in time one minute.
In fact, the viewers are led to believe Dastan thinks of nothing but clearing his name and finding the traitor, even when he discovers that if someone breaks the hourglass of time they can go back to any incident in their life they want and change the future - however, doing so will unleash the wrath of the gods.
When Dastan realizes who really betrayed him and his father, he realizes that that person wants to change time so that he can let the king die and he will be the king of Persia. That means that Dastan's brothers would never have been born - and Dastan would have been left to rot in the Persian streets.
So along with a crook who calls himself an entrepreneur and refuses to pay taxes, a knife-thrower with a conscious, a princess he's falling in love with, and a host of other characters, Dastan is determined to stop his uncle from changing the past, allowing his father to die as a young boy, and seizing the throne.
The plot did go a little hazy and get confusing, but by the end everything was explained.
The movie focuses on destiny and choice, a seemingly favorite topic as of late. Do we have the right to choose our future, or is it laid in stone? Dastan learns that it is all about the choices we make, as he faces some difficult ones, in addition to his destiny, which plays a part near the end. Others, like the princess, still believe in destiny and do whatever it takes to fulfill what they believe their destiny is.
Dastan is extremely noble - honor is everything to him, with his foil character being his uncle, who is power-hungry and greedy. Yet most of his uncle's problems come from feeling under-appreciated, something a lot of people can relate to, especially if they work at entry-level jobs or attend school. Under appreciation is the core for a lot of problems in society, according to research. Then again, most under appreciated people don't murder their entire family to gain a throne. There was a lot of that going on back then, so in that case it was well-researched.
Dastan's father and the princess reference praying and and being in the temple, and some characters take a jab at God and gods in general. However, it seems Dastan isn't afraid of the gods, and neither are his brothers, his companions, or his uncle. They put little stock in destiny or fate except when it relates to them, like with the uncle's desire to break something the gods supposedly gave to mankind. However, he seems to think less of the gods and people than himself. Dastan is wild but only kills people who are trying to kill him. He would probably be considered a delinquent in our society, one of those people that others look at and think, "He should be in prison." But when push comes to shove, Dastan is willing to sacrifice his life to save his brothers, his friends, his father, and his country from his evil uncle.
There weren't any raunchy sex scenes. There were some near-kiss scenes, some cleavage, some male-stomach skin, and a lot of jokes, but nothing bad was shown. There was a lot of violence and action scenes, but it made sense because the movie was loosely-based on the "Prince of Persia" videogame series.
I actually thoroughly enjoyed this movie. I'm going to go back and see it again in theaters, maybe three times, and when it comes out I'm going to buy it. It was that good. For being from Disney, the acting was great, even though it was obvious most of the action scenes were CGI. I think that was the point, even though it was slightly annoying.
Surprisingly, there are four characters who could be the title character: Dastan, Dastan's uncle Nizam, or Dastan's brothers, Garsiv and Tus. These four characters were all princes of Persia in the movie and played important roles. Whose story was this, Dastan's Garsiv's, Tus', or Nizam's? It had to be Dastan's story - he was the character to be admired, although his brothers showed their own strength and courage. Nizam was to be hated in this one, betraying Dastan and revealing his true feelings: he always believed that Dastan was nothing more than trash. He never understood why, in his own words, his brother "scraped" Dastan off the streets. He should never have been saved by the King. However, it soon became clear that plucking Dastan off the streets and raising him as a prince was the best decision he ever made, especially when Dastan saved humanity from wrath.
So it is all about choices - sometimes our choices kill us, sometimes they save us, and sometimes, they are the biggest regrets of our lives. But they are still ours, and in the end, we must live with them. Dastan got a second chance to change the past, but for everyone else, we can only limp along and hope that we make choices we can live wtih for 50-plus years.
Lots of Love,
Rachel
That's what happens a lot. People go to see a movie based on who's in it. Sometimes it turns out to be terrible, and sometimes, it turns out great.
"Prince of Persia" is one such movie that could have been awful but turned out quite well.
The king of Persia has two sons and one brother. However, it seems that his family is not yet complete, and when he is in the marketplace in one of his cities, he witnesses a courageous fatherless young boy, Dastan, a street rat who takes the punishment for one of his friends. Right before the soldiers chop off his hand, the king breaks in and declares that he is adopting the boy as his son. Why? Because the boy is extremely courageous...and because he would be a prince who did not have his eye on the Persian throne. And in that way a boy from the streets became a prince of Persia.
Fast forward fifteen years. Dastan is now preparing for battle and decides to stop a massacre. He gets in and the Persian people declare him the lion of Persia. He and his brothers take over the Holy City. Along the way he finds a dagger and a princess who is the guardian of the dagger- and the dagger happens to be the Dagger of Time, which can control time and take the person holding it back in time.
Dastan learns about the power only after his father is murdered. Dastan is framed for the murder and forced to flee with the princess (to whom his father has betrothed him) who wants nothing more than to slit his throat and steal the dagger back for its own protection. Dastan does not try to change the past and save his father with the dagger, for people can only go back in time one minute.
In fact, the viewers are led to believe Dastan thinks of nothing but clearing his name and finding the traitor, even when he discovers that if someone breaks the hourglass of time they can go back to any incident in their life they want and change the future - however, doing so will unleash the wrath of the gods.
When Dastan realizes who really betrayed him and his father, he realizes that that person wants to change time so that he can let the king die and he will be the king of Persia. That means that Dastan's brothers would never have been born - and Dastan would have been left to rot in the Persian streets.
So along with a crook who calls himself an entrepreneur and refuses to pay taxes, a knife-thrower with a conscious, a princess he's falling in love with, and a host of other characters, Dastan is determined to stop his uncle from changing the past, allowing his father to die as a young boy, and seizing the throne.
The plot did go a little hazy and get confusing, but by the end everything was explained.
The movie focuses on destiny and choice, a seemingly favorite topic as of late. Do we have the right to choose our future, or is it laid in stone? Dastan learns that it is all about the choices we make, as he faces some difficult ones, in addition to his destiny, which plays a part near the end. Others, like the princess, still believe in destiny and do whatever it takes to fulfill what they believe their destiny is.
Dastan is extremely noble - honor is everything to him, with his foil character being his uncle, who is power-hungry and greedy. Yet most of his uncle's problems come from feeling under-appreciated, something a lot of people can relate to, especially if they work at entry-level jobs or attend school. Under appreciation is the core for a lot of problems in society, according to research. Then again, most under appreciated people don't murder their entire family to gain a throne. There was a lot of that going on back then, so in that case it was well-researched.
Dastan's father and the princess reference praying and and being in the temple, and some characters take a jab at God and gods in general. However, it seems Dastan isn't afraid of the gods, and neither are his brothers, his companions, or his uncle. They put little stock in destiny or fate except when it relates to them, like with the uncle's desire to break something the gods supposedly gave to mankind. However, he seems to think less of the gods and people than himself. Dastan is wild but only kills people who are trying to kill him. He would probably be considered a delinquent in our society, one of those people that others look at and think, "He should be in prison." But when push comes to shove, Dastan is willing to sacrifice his life to save his brothers, his friends, his father, and his country from his evil uncle.
There weren't any raunchy sex scenes. There were some near-kiss scenes, some cleavage, some male-stomach skin, and a lot of jokes, but nothing bad was shown. There was a lot of violence and action scenes, but it made sense because the movie was loosely-based on the "Prince of Persia" videogame series.
I actually thoroughly enjoyed this movie. I'm going to go back and see it again in theaters, maybe three times, and when it comes out I'm going to buy it. It was that good. For being from Disney, the acting was great, even though it was obvious most of the action scenes were CGI. I think that was the point, even though it was slightly annoying.
Surprisingly, there are four characters who could be the title character: Dastan, Dastan's uncle Nizam, or Dastan's brothers, Garsiv and Tus. These four characters were all princes of Persia in the movie and played important roles. Whose story was this, Dastan's Garsiv's, Tus', or Nizam's? It had to be Dastan's story - he was the character to be admired, although his brothers showed their own strength and courage. Nizam was to be hated in this one, betraying Dastan and revealing his true feelings: he always believed that Dastan was nothing more than trash. He never understood why, in his own words, his brother "scraped" Dastan off the streets. He should never have been saved by the King. However, it soon became clear that plucking Dastan off the streets and raising him as a prince was the best decision he ever made, especially when Dastan saved humanity from wrath.
So it is all about choices - sometimes our choices kill us, sometimes they save us, and sometimes, they are the biggest regrets of our lives. But they are still ours, and in the end, we must live with them. Dastan got a second chance to change the past, but for everyone else, we can only limp along and hope that we make choices we can live wtih for 50-plus years.
Lots of Love,
Rachel
Labels:
adventure,
dastan,
father,
frame,
jake gyllenhaal,
love,
movie,
movie review,
murder,
persia,
prince,
prince of persia,
princess
07 May 2010
End of the semester
Not much to say. Classes are done for the semester. I just have finals left. So exhausted!!!!! But very exhausted. I am blowing off steam watching a movie on the campus movie channel. Excited but sad to leave
Labels:
Classes done semester
30 April 2010
Alcohol and mosquitos?
Found this on facebook...next time I get a mosquito I am going to use this idea!
"Several years ago while attending one of our son's baseball games, I {some random lady I found this on one of my friend's facebook pages} smacked a mosquito that exploded blood all over my arm, realized I was surrounded by strangers with who knows what diseases, and decided to run home and clean it up. I doused it with alcohol, and to my amazement, within 15-20 minutes the large bite was dried up and GONE. First, though, it itched worse than ever, before drying up. Now I do this with every mosquito bite and it always works for me (but not for others for some reason)."
So now you know...alcohol works for more than just checking out of the world! (and she means rubbing alcohol by the way).
"Several years ago while attending one of our son's baseball games, I {some random lady I found this on one of my friend's facebook pages} smacked a mosquito that exploded blood all over my arm, realized I was surrounded by strangers with who knows what diseases, and decided to run home and clean it up. I doused it with alcohol, and to my amazement, within 15-20 minutes the large bite was dried up and GONE. First, though, it itched worse than ever, before drying up. Now I do this with every mosquito bite and it always works for me (but not for others for some reason)."
So now you know...alcohol works for more than just checking out of the world! (and she means rubbing alcohol by the way).
Babies, babies, babies!
The adorable precious little angels God gives are everywhere, it seems. I am not pregnant myself; I am still a happy virgin and proud of it. I will be waiting until my wedding night, thank you very much.
I do however know many, many pregnant people. It's strange how excited women get - despite the sickness, they never seem to blame their baby, never once. That's because as women we have a special relationship with children - we carry them inside of us for months, and they live on 3% of what we intake during that time, according to my friend's baby book. They need their mother; without the mother they would die.
It's an amazing gift God has given to us women in spite of the problems we possess. It shows that He does NOT blame us for eating the fruit. It is not, I want to add, women's faults. ADAM, the man who was in charge of the woman, was ALSO there. He was standing right there listening to the snake and did not stop his wife from listening at all. And that is why, really, he got the worst end of the deal.
Anyway, we are blessed. Sure, it's annoying, it's hard, it's tiring, and once the baby comes it's a lifelong commitment (trust me, few kids leave at 18 and never return - my family is the prime example of that).
But still. Holding the baby, feeling its warm body sitting on your lap, holding it while its sleeping, have it smiling at you, kissing you, hugging you, wanting to be near you...it's euphoric and addicting. I can see why mothers become incredibly attached to their children - they were once inside of your body, and now are outside of it, but still want to be part of it. As they grow older they don't want it, but still. At one time they were completely in love with you, and they still are.
So it's that time of the year...babies! I wish I was married so I could have a baby! I'm enjoying my free time, and of course I want a whole flock of children, 5 or 6 or 7 or 8 or 9 or a dozen or two dozen. Eventually they just walk right out! lol. I want a lot of arrows in my quiver for the Lord, and I want to bring about new life. I am also fine adopting children, and will probably foster or adopt many, many children. Maybe I can't run an orphanage, but I can adopt one.
I do however know many, many pregnant people. It's strange how excited women get - despite the sickness, they never seem to blame their baby, never once. That's because as women we have a special relationship with children - we carry them inside of us for months, and they live on 3% of what we intake during that time, according to my friend's baby book. They need their mother; without the mother they would die.
It's an amazing gift God has given to us women in spite of the problems we possess. It shows that He does NOT blame us for eating the fruit. It is not, I want to add, women's faults. ADAM, the man who was in charge of the woman, was ALSO there. He was standing right there listening to the snake and did not stop his wife from listening at all. And that is why, really, he got the worst end of the deal.
Anyway, we are blessed. Sure, it's annoying, it's hard, it's tiring, and once the baby comes it's a lifelong commitment (trust me, few kids leave at 18 and never return - my family is the prime example of that).
But still. Holding the baby, feeling its warm body sitting on your lap, holding it while its sleeping, have it smiling at you, kissing you, hugging you, wanting to be near you...it's euphoric and addicting. I can see why mothers become incredibly attached to their children - they were once inside of your body, and now are outside of it, but still want to be part of it. As they grow older they don't want it, but still. At one time they were completely in love with you, and they still are.
So it's that time of the year...babies! I wish I was married so I could have a baby! I'm enjoying my free time, and of course I want a whole flock of children, 5 or 6 or 7 or 8 or 9 or a dozen or two dozen. Eventually they just walk right out! lol. I want a lot of arrows in my quiver for the Lord, and I want to bring about new life. I am also fine adopting children, and will probably foster or adopt many, many children. Maybe I can't run an orphanage, but I can adopt one.
27 April 2010
‘The Back-Up Plan’ becomes a first-rate plan
Movie Review
Rachel Weatherford
This was supposed to be in the Arrow, but it was so good they were jealous of it and decided not to publish it. Go figure! I'm joining the starving artist brigade.
In a comical twist of fate, Jennifer Lopez’s character, Zoe, the owner of a pet store, decides to be artificially inseminated after years of dating and getting no commitment. After her first and only appointment, she hails a cab and meets the guy of her dreams, a cheese farmer named Stan, played by Alex O’Loughlin. Even though it’s clear they are both attracted to each other, it takes awhile for them to enter a relationship. After they become a couple they learn that Zoe is pregnant from the in-vitro fertilization, a rarity, and getting pregnant with twins on the first time is unheard of, except, of course, in Zoe’s case.
During her time alone, Zoe gets involved in a single mother’s group, who add to the movie. One woman still breastfeeds her three-year-old, and another is a tough, in-your-face woman who is the core of one particularly wide-eyed scene later in the movie. The leader of the group is a former hippie whose funniest line is, “Some of us don’t have penis partners.”
Zoe and Stan begin to formally date shortly after Zoe joins the group. They go to the birth of one of the single mothers, who insists that Zoe is her focal point, forcing her to stand there and watch her give birth, which gives the perfectionistic Zoe a comic shake-up. The other woman’s birth scene was portrayed so well that, even though it should have been a weird moment, it was really light-hearted and easy to handle instead of awkward.
Another hilarious scene is when Zoe is at the doctor’s office. The doctor says, “There’s two heartbeats.” She replies, “The baby has two hearts?!” Then the doctor says, “No, you’re carrying twins!” And that is when Stan faints.
The couple are not without trouble. Zoe believes Stan doesn’t want her children, but later realizes she read his reactions too deeply, providing a touching commentary on the consequences of jumping to conclusions and miscommunication.
Abortion nor adoption were discussed after Zoe found Stan. Zoe’s attitude was that if Stan wouldn’t accept her children, he wouldn’t have her, and since Stan was crazy about Zoe, he accepted her children. Throughout the movie he is nervous, and another father he meets on the playground gives him some not-so-helpful and frightening advice. Of course, they get engaged after the twin girls are born. At the end of the movie, Zoe throws up and the viewers are led to believe that Zoe is pregnant again, only this time with Stan’s child instead of a stranger’s.
We get some slapstick comedy, like falling, spilling, and water-spraying. The greatest supporting actress was the dog, who alternated between begging for food and growling at Stan. The dog did not have any back legs; its back legs were a cart it used to run around with. The movie was hilarious and excellent, and it felt original instead of just being a worn-out romantic comedy movie.
Rachel Weatherford
This was supposed to be in the Arrow, but it was so good they were jealous of it and decided not to publish it. Go figure! I'm joining the starving artist brigade.
In a comical twist of fate, Jennifer Lopez’s character, Zoe, the owner of a pet store, decides to be artificially inseminated after years of dating and getting no commitment. After her first and only appointment, she hails a cab and meets the guy of her dreams, a cheese farmer named Stan, played by Alex O’Loughlin. Even though it’s clear they are both attracted to each other, it takes awhile for them to enter a relationship. After they become a couple they learn that Zoe is pregnant from the in-vitro fertilization, a rarity, and getting pregnant with twins on the first time is unheard of, except, of course, in Zoe’s case.
During her time alone, Zoe gets involved in a single mother’s group, who add to the movie. One woman still breastfeeds her three-year-old, and another is a tough, in-your-face woman who is the core of one particularly wide-eyed scene later in the movie. The leader of the group is a former hippie whose funniest line is, “Some of us don’t have penis partners.”
Zoe and Stan begin to formally date shortly after Zoe joins the group. They go to the birth of one of the single mothers, who insists that Zoe is her focal point, forcing her to stand there and watch her give birth, which gives the perfectionistic Zoe a comic shake-up. The other woman’s birth scene was portrayed so well that, even though it should have been a weird moment, it was really light-hearted and easy to handle instead of awkward.
Another hilarious scene is when Zoe is at the doctor’s office. The doctor says, “There’s two heartbeats.” She replies, “The baby has two hearts?!” Then the doctor says, “No, you’re carrying twins!” And that is when Stan faints.
The couple are not without trouble. Zoe believes Stan doesn’t want her children, but later realizes she read his reactions too deeply, providing a touching commentary on the consequences of jumping to conclusions and miscommunication.
Abortion nor adoption were discussed after Zoe found Stan. Zoe’s attitude was that if Stan wouldn’t accept her children, he wouldn’t have her, and since Stan was crazy about Zoe, he accepted her children. Throughout the movie he is nervous, and another father he meets on the playground gives him some not-so-helpful and frightening advice. Of course, they get engaged after the twin girls are born. At the end of the movie, Zoe throws up and the viewers are led to believe that Zoe is pregnant again, only this time with Stan’s child instead of a stranger’s.
We get some slapstick comedy, like falling, spilling, and water-spraying. The greatest supporting actress was the dog, who alternated between begging for food and growling at Stan. The dog did not have any back legs; its back legs were a cart it used to run around with. The movie was hilarious and excellent, and it felt original instead of just being a worn-out romantic comedy movie.
Labels:
backup plan,
jlo,
lopez,
movie,
stan
25 April 2010
'Hounddog' is Dakota Fanning's saddest, most disturbing movie
Here's the trailer for the movie "Hounddog" starring Dakota Fanning, Robert Wright Penn, David Morse, Piper Laurie and a few others.
It's actually a decent, touching movie. It starts out slow but gradually improves itself, especially after Dakota Fanning, who plays Lewellen, a nine-year-old Southern girl obsessed with Elvis Presley music, gets raped and tries to deal with the results. Her father, portrayed by David Morse, gets struck nearly dumb by a bolt of lightening on their farm.
The interesting dilemma is the issue of Lewellen's father. Lewellen's aunt claims that Lewellen's grandmother (Lewellen's mother's mother) is in love with Lewellen's father, implying some hinky-pink on the part of the grandmother. The aunt says that the grandmother is keeping the aunt and the father apart so she could have her. It turns out that both Lewellen's mother and aunt desire Lewellen's father, and the aunt wants to take care of Lewellen because she belongs to Lewellen.
It seems that this neglected tween has more people who love her than they actually show her, revealing that, for whatever reason people do things, love (even if it is a twisted, ugly form) is at the root of it - or so this movie indicates. Lewellen's grandmother is cold-hearted and emotionless; her grandmother is obsessed with sin and believing that her granddaughter is a sinner, forcing the girl to pay for her parents' sins by being overly authoritarian. The grandmother is also the reason why Lewellen's parents got married and why Lewellen has never known her mother's sister, her aunt who later comes so they can move in together and Lewellen's aunt can raise her.
Lewellen's father is self-obsessed and indulgent of his child, though there is some implication that Lewellen's father beats her after we see a mark and Lewellen says she will kill her father someday (which she does when she allows a rattlesnake to bite him and not warning him - she merely calls out that she loves him). Since there is only one bed in the two-room house Lewellen and her father live in, the viewers assume that the girl and her father share the bed. This is enforced by a scene when the girl brings a blanket and wraps her father in it and sleeps at his feet under the same blanket. Since she's only nine, there's no reason to believe the father's hurting her sexually, although based on her promiscious tendacies I sort of decided he probably did. Why else does a nine-year-old motherless girl want to see a boy's penis?
Lewellen was a disturbing girl, before and after the teenage boy raped her. Although I don't believe she should have been raped, she certainly didn't help anything when she took off her clothes in front of him and started dancing like Elvis Presley. I understand she is nine and is in love with Elvis and I understand why, but still. She shouldn't have done that.
Her friend Buddy is the classic example of peer pressure surrender. He allows her to get raped so he looks cool in front of her rapist. Lewellen isn't a great friend to him, but that's low. It's clear he just wants to be accepted by these older boys, and will do anything for it. The movie tells us that seeking to be with 'cool' bad kids just leads to a world of hurt and trouble. Just stay away from them.
What should we get from the movie? Pick real friends, don't be too obsessed, and ultimately we decide on what we do in life. We have choices and we make them. Just make the right ones.
The movie deals with grief, promiscuity, betrayal, friendship, family, secrets, lies, sex, race, drinking, parents, children, music, influences, peers, boys, girls, and, of course, rape and the consequences thereof. It is a deeply moving, slightly frightening tale that, in reality, could be someday's story - and maybe it really was.
Rachel
It's actually a decent, touching movie. It starts out slow but gradually improves itself, especially after Dakota Fanning, who plays Lewellen, a nine-year-old Southern girl obsessed with Elvis Presley music, gets raped and tries to deal with the results. Her father, portrayed by David Morse, gets struck nearly dumb by a bolt of lightening on their farm.
The interesting dilemma is the issue of Lewellen's father. Lewellen's aunt claims that Lewellen's grandmother (Lewellen's mother's mother) is in love with Lewellen's father, implying some hinky-pink on the part of the grandmother. The aunt says that the grandmother is keeping the aunt and the father apart so she could have her. It turns out that both Lewellen's mother and aunt desire Lewellen's father, and the aunt wants to take care of Lewellen because she belongs to Lewellen.
It seems that this neglected tween has more people who love her than they actually show her, revealing that, for whatever reason people do things, love (even if it is a twisted, ugly form) is at the root of it - or so this movie indicates. Lewellen's grandmother is cold-hearted and emotionless; her grandmother is obsessed with sin and believing that her granddaughter is a sinner, forcing the girl to pay for her parents' sins by being overly authoritarian. The grandmother is also the reason why Lewellen's parents got married and why Lewellen has never known her mother's sister, her aunt who later comes so they can move in together and Lewellen's aunt can raise her.
Lewellen's father is self-obsessed and indulgent of his child, though there is some implication that Lewellen's father beats her after we see a mark and Lewellen says she will kill her father someday (which she does when she allows a rattlesnake to bite him and not warning him - she merely calls out that she loves him). Since there is only one bed in the two-room house Lewellen and her father live in, the viewers assume that the girl and her father share the bed. This is enforced by a scene when the girl brings a blanket and wraps her father in it and sleeps at his feet under the same blanket. Since she's only nine, there's no reason to believe the father's hurting her sexually, although based on her promiscious tendacies I sort of decided he probably did. Why else does a nine-year-old motherless girl want to see a boy's penis?
Lewellen was a disturbing girl, before and after the teenage boy raped her. Although I don't believe she should have been raped, she certainly didn't help anything when she took off her clothes in front of him and started dancing like Elvis Presley. I understand she is nine and is in love with Elvis and I understand why, but still. She shouldn't have done that.
Her friend Buddy is the classic example of peer pressure surrender. He allows her to get raped so he looks cool in front of her rapist. Lewellen isn't a great friend to him, but that's low. It's clear he just wants to be accepted by these older boys, and will do anything for it. The movie tells us that seeking to be with 'cool' bad kids just leads to a world of hurt and trouble. Just stay away from them.
What should we get from the movie? Pick real friends, don't be too obsessed, and ultimately we decide on what we do in life. We have choices and we make them. Just make the right ones.
The movie deals with grief, promiscuity, betrayal, friendship, family, secrets, lies, sex, race, drinking, parents, children, music, influences, peers, boys, girls, and, of course, rape and the consequences thereof. It is a deeply moving, slightly frightening tale that, in reality, could be someday's story - and maybe it really was.
Rachel
20 April 2010
God fully loves us and accepts us, and we are pleasing to Him
Recently I've endured quite a scene, but I believe it's something everyone goes through at some point. To encourage people with how I've dealt with it, I wanted to include it in my blog.
Criticism.
Mistakes.
Blame.
It takes two to tango and blame is mutual. One person usually is not completely at fault, though they may be more responsible than others. We live in a society, not an individualistic environment.
I don't want to go deeply into details in an effort to avoid gossip, but last week became extremely stressful for everyone involved and, when stress runs around, there is usually problems. And the lower man on the totem pole gets the brunt. Which I'm fine with. NOW. I want to be stronger. My reputation is in God's hand - there is nothing I can do to save it.
Although I feel incredible peace after a sweet time with God, I still feel pain somewhat. I was completely blindsided by the confrontation; I am not a person who pays particular sense to anything. Drama does not mean anything to me. I avoid it at all possible costs; I am non-confrontational. However, I am completely tempted to leave the environment and leave them with more problems. I am struggling between being glad they confronted me and annoyance that they felt able to correct me while displaying hypocritical characteristics.
I dislike hypocrites. Be innocent as a dove and shrewd as a serpent.
I also understand that I am in a spiritual. I just want to encourage everyone that if someone addresses something, you are either in the wrong or involved in a spiritual battle. I've been at the forefront of a spiritual battle, but I also brought it upon myself and furthered it because I would not back down. I don't even know what's right or wrong.
Now, I'm sure this is very confusing, but I just want to put something out there. God fully and 100% loves us, accepts us, justifies us, redeems us. We are pleasing to Him. We are His children. The other people who hurt, confuse, and blindside us are also His children and deserve the same thing. Who knows? Maybe because you shine like a Christian someone will be saved.
Lots of Love,
Rachel
Criticism.
Mistakes.
Blame.
It takes two to tango and blame is mutual. One person usually is not completely at fault, though they may be more responsible than others. We live in a society, not an individualistic environment.
I don't want to go deeply into details in an effort to avoid gossip, but last week became extremely stressful for everyone involved and, when stress runs around, there is usually problems. And the lower man on the totem pole gets the brunt. Which I'm fine with. NOW. I want to be stronger. My reputation is in God's hand - there is nothing I can do to save it.
Although I feel incredible peace after a sweet time with God, I still feel pain somewhat. I was completely blindsided by the confrontation; I am not a person who pays particular sense to anything. Drama does not mean anything to me. I avoid it at all possible costs; I am non-confrontational. However, I am completely tempted to leave the environment and leave them with more problems. I am struggling between being glad they confronted me and annoyance that they felt able to correct me while displaying hypocritical characteristics.
I dislike hypocrites. Be innocent as a dove and shrewd as a serpent.
I also understand that I am in a spiritual. I just want to encourage everyone that if someone addresses something, you are either in the wrong or involved in a spiritual battle. I've been at the forefront of a spiritual battle, but I also brought it upon myself and furthered it because I would not back down. I don't even know what's right or wrong.
Now, I'm sure this is very confusing, but I just want to put something out there. God fully and 100% loves us, accepts us, justifies us, redeems us. We are pleasing to Him. We are His children. The other people who hurt, confuse, and blindside us are also His children and deserve the same thing. Who knows? Maybe because you shine like a Christian someone will be saved.
Lots of Love,
Rachel
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)